Ecology's Phthalates Action Plan

48 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Toxic-Free Future (Erika Schreder)

6/15/23 @ 5:06 PM
No message. See attached letter.
Attachments:

Comment From: Public Health - Seattle & King... (Shirlee Tan)

6/15/23 @ 11:29 AM
Kimberly, Thank you again for the opportunity to comments and for your flexibility with our delay! Attached is our comment letter. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or clarification. We’re very excited to see this work moving fo...
Attachments:

Comment From: Seattle Public Utilities - Haz... (Ashley Evans)

6/15/23 @ 10:14 AM
Ms. Grieves, Please find attached a comment letter on the Phthalates Action Plan from the Hazardous Waste Management Plan. I believe the comment period ended yesterday. Are you still able to accept this letter? Also, can you please confirm that you r...
Attachments:

Comment From: Zero Waste Washington (Heather Trim)

6/14/23 @ 9:49 PM
We are disappointed that all of the recommended actions are voluntary or research-orireinted. We would like to see some actions that would directly lead to restrictions, bans and other actions that would make meaningful reductions in phthalates use s...

There are steps that Ecology and other state agencies can do now, such as update state procurement contracts to restrict the purchase of products with phthalates, not just provide guidance. This would serve as a model for other contracts and institutions. And state building projects (page 62) should be mandated to use phthalate-free products if they are available as alternatives as building and construction materials.

The action plan should include timelines. And also the plan should prioritize the recommendations in order of impact, i.e., starting with those which would make the biggest difference for human and wildlife health.

Thank you,
Heather Trim
Zero Waste Washington
No attachments

Comment From: The Coalition for Clean Water (Kyle Dorsey)

6/14/23 @ 8:18 PM
These comments are submitted on behalf of the Coalition for Clean Water. Our members provide wastewater treatment to many of Washington's citizens across the state. Member agencies include the cities of Bremerton, Everett, Seattle, Lynnwood, Tacoma, ...

We thank the Departments of Ecology and Health, other state agencies, and members of the advisory committee for their efforts in producing the draft CAP. Developing a CAP is a challenging task. Many details will need to be worked out as individual recommendations are implemented.

The plan presents a clear picture:

• Phthalates are ubiquitous in the manufacturing of products, the environment, and our lives.
• The primary source of exposure for people is ingestion, mostly from food and water; house dust is an important pathway of exposure for children.
• Phthalates degrade relatively quickly in the environment and in our bodies but their broad presence in manufactured products means they are constantly released to the environment, and we are constantly exposed.

The plan anticipates that lead agencies will prioritize the implementation of recommendations with input from stakeholders. We support Safer Products for Washington and efforts to find alternative and less hazardous substitutes for phthalates and other substances that are determined to pose a risk to health or the environment. Wastewater treatment plants (and biosolids) are passive receivers of phthalates from other sources. We ask that Ecology focus its greatest effort on curtailing the true sources of phthalates by working with manufacturers to find better alternatives, and with consumers to change purchasing habits. If the use of phthalates is reduced, a corresponding reduction will be seen in biosolids and wastewater influent and effluent, as has been the case with other substances of concern.

The plan places biosolids and wastewater in the category of Solid Waste Media. Under state law in RCW 70A.226, biosolids are a valuable commodity and are explicitly not solid waste. We ask that you separate wastewater and biosolids from the management of solid wastes, which by law and rule appropriately include compost facilities, recycling products and packaging, and landfills.

The plan offers positive observations about biosolids, but also characterizes them as a source of phthalates and a threat, on some level, to human health and the environment. Perspective is important. Food contamination comes from many sources, the most significant of which have nothing to do with biosolids. Croplands treated with biosolids are less than 0.1 percent of Washington's total land area and perhaps 0.2 percent of agricultural land. Biosolids are used in many applications that do not include food crops, including the reclamation of disturbed and contaminated sites, growing timber, and the product of fiber for pulp. Most biosolids are not handled with bare hands (if at all), and plant uptake is only one component of many complex pathways involved in exposure and risk assessment. Biosolids permit criteria address surface water and groundwater, as well as soil types, slopes, rainfall, method of application, and other considerations.

Ecology needs to expand the scope of its consideration for inputs of phthalates in agricultural settings. Other potential sources of phthalates include commercial fertilizers and pesticides, products designed to enhance soil water retention, and product packaging.

The first bullet under Recommendation 1 of the Solid Waste Media Recommendations section should include composting biosolids as a method of treatment to be assessed. In Recommendations 2 and 3, Ecology says it will need to work with farmers to plan and coordinate sampling efforts for crops/fodder grown on biosolid-amended soil. Biosolids generators have carefully cultivated working relationships with farmers and other users over many years and have a very large investment in those relationships. We ask that Ecology approach this as working with both users and producers.

We note that area universities are omitted as partners in research, yet both the University of Washington and Washington State University have done significant research on biosolids beneficial use and stormwater analysis. Ecology should take advantage of that expertise.

Thank you for taking the time to consider our comments and recommendations. Respectfully and on behalf of the members of the Coalition for Clean Water,

Kyle Dorsey
Executive Director
No attachments

Comment From: Discovery Clean Water Alliance (Kristen Thomas)

6/14/23 @ 4:09 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: American Chemistry Council (Eileen Conneely)

6/14/23 @ 3:51 PM
Please see the attached comments from the American Chemistry Council.
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington Refuse & Recycling ... (Rod Whittaker)

6/14/23 @ 3:17 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Friends of Miller Peninsula St... (Darlene Schanfald)

6/14/23 @ 3:05 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: BASF Corporation (Patrick Harmon)

6/14/23 @ 12:32 PM
See attached document for comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington Association of Sewe... (Judi Gladstone)

6/14/23 @ 12:17 PM
The Washington Association of Sewer and Water Districts (WASWD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Phthalates Action Plan. WASWD represents more than 180 public sewer and water districts in the state, serving nearly 25% of our st...

In reviewing the plan, we are disturbed by some of the language contained in the Biosolids section. In this section, conclusive statements are shortly followed by statements about available science that casts uncertainty on preceding and subsequent conclusive statements. Starting on page 65, the first sentence states "Biosolids from composting and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can serve as continued sources of phthalate emissions into the environment and pose a risk to human health." This very definitive statement is followed by another at the end of the same paragraph, stating "Scientists have not conducted studies characterizing the lifecycle of phthalates through the WWTP process, the land application of biosolids, uptake into crops, or composted biosolids in Washington state." This is followed by "However, it is possible that biosolids contain phthalates resulting from pre-WWTP sources (King County, 2021)." A little later in the section is the statement "Phthalates will biodegrade in WWTPs, and biodegradation rates are dependent on treatment conditions, such as oxygen levels, microorganisms, and temperature." These statements taken together (with emphasis added) really indicate that the state of the science and risk to human health from biosolids potentially containing phthalates is not well established. That renders the first sentence speculative and unsupported by facts, and it should be removed completely as it is alarmist and inaccurate.

In general, there is really no proper context for land application of biosolids presented in this document. There needs to be a lot more attention paid to the magnitude of the problem related to their manufacture. If there were less phthalates produced and used, there would be less in biosolids. Biosolids are applied to less than .01% of agricultural lands in any year, thus the magnitude of the problem of phthalates in biosolids is miniscule compared to exposure via everyday activities at work and in the home. The plan overall gives other sources of phthalates and needs to be sure that biosolids is presented in context, conveying the appropriate magnitude of the impact of phthalates from biosolids. In looking at the paragraph above, this section needs to be reworked, and alarmist language removed.

There is also a need to broaden the scope of phthalates as they may appear in agriculture, not just land-applied biosolids. The potential for phthalates to be associated with seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides are very real, depending on coatings, application methods and storage of these items. Irrigation water should also be examined. As with PFAS and PCB compounds, it has been surprising where these have been found once you look for them.

The proposed recommendations related to biosolids get down to the crux of the matter in calling for more studies on transport and breakdown, partitioning to water and soil, evaluating plant uptake, and evaluating fate of compounds in composted biosolids. We agree with these recommendations. More studies are needed before making the conclusive statements currently in the document.

The section on Drinking Water is a testament to the hard-working professionals in the water treatment business, with sampling for certain phthalates since 1993 indicating no confirmed MCL violations for phthalates in public drinking water sources. We agree with the recommendations to keep monitoring in compliance with EPA and DOH standards, and for education on proper sampling to avoid inadvertent contamination. We also agree with the three year review of recommendations and implementation. This can provide an update on necessary studies, and will provide feedback on the impact of programs like medical equipment change-out, personal care product formulation changes, food packaging changes and replacement of the myriad other products containing phthalates.

Thank you for your attention to these comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Food Northwest (Pamela Barrow)

6/13/23 @ 2:57 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: CarolLee Braithwait

5/30/23 @ 1:47 PM
As a retired special education teacher, developmental difficulties are very real to me. I am aghast that no more progress has been made in getting this horrible compound out of our food supply. And by food supply, I mean anything that can conceivab...
We've gotten lead out of paint; let's get phthalates out of our environment.
No attachments

Comment From: King County Wastewater Treatme... (Kamuron Gurol)

5/30/23 @ 10:37 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Washington State Potato Commis... (Matt Harris)

5/22/23 @ 9:55 AM
We are requesting representation on the workgroup charged with reducing the sources of phthalates in food and beverages through technical assistance, education, and voluntary actions in food production and food service in Washington (Food Contact Art...
No attachments

Comment From: Wendy Ferrell

5/06/23 @ 5:50 AM
I am very concerned about the plastic gear used by aquaculture companies in Puget Sound. They cover the tideflats with gigantic sheets of netting, along with plastic bags, that show up on shorelines as debris. They also drill millions of PVC pipes ...
No attachments

Comment From: Public Health - Seattle & King... (Shirlee Tan)

11/18/22 @ 3:26 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Public Health - Seattle & King... (Shirlee Tan)

11/08/22 @ 9:29 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: LARRY DUNN

11/03/22 @ 1:30 PM
attached is a file that lists microplastics issues involving pthalates. I would recommend thaat you look into the disposal of medical masks due to the 10/22 study included. Larry Dunn NTTC
Attachments:

Comment From: PHSKC- EH (Ryan Kellogg)

8/24/22 @ 9:45 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: American Chemistry Council (Eileen Conneely)

7/15/22 @ 12:13 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Household & Commercial Product... (Nicholas Georges)

7/15/22 @ 12:13 PM
The Household & Commercial Products Association (HCPA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached letter. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning our feedback.
Attachments:

Comment From: Waste Connections (Jody Snyder)

7/15/22 @ 12:04 PM
Landfills and recycling
The advisory committee noted it would be most pertinent to reduce sources of phthalates upstream to reduce levels entering the solid waste stream in the first place.
Landfill section:
Solid waste system operators neither manufact...
No attachments

Comment From: Advanced Medical Technology As... (Bobby Patrick)

7/15/22 @ 9:24 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Zero Waste Washington (Heather Trim)

7/14/22 @ 5:26 PM
Overall, the scope looks comprehensive. I just have a few suggested additions:

Under household products, I would add "plastic products." There are items that do not strictly fit under the list of items you have included, such as as combs and beauty ...

Under automotive products, I would add brake pads. In our study, it was very concerning to find phthalates in our testing of brake pad samples. I would also include other car and truck components such as tires and retreaded tires.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Heather Trim
No attachments

Comment From: DES (Leatta Dahlhoff)

7/05/22 @ 10:02 AM
Is there an opportunity to do a pilot test/project with DES on products being purchased through Master Contracts? We could take your list of products and see what state agencies are purchasing said products...and test alternatives as well for your id...

Will there be a list of preferred products vs restricted products?

Will there be a working list of EPP products?

We support testing of wastewater treatment plants of their influent and effluent.

Please further investigate cleaning products. At DES we are working on green janitorial products and could use your information to make better informed decisions on what to allow to be purchased on Master Contracts and what products to restrict.
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Godlewski

4/15/22 @ 5:13 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Eileen Conneely

4/15/22 @ 8:22 AM
Please see attached comments from the American Chemistry Council's High Phthalates Panel. Thank you for the opportunity to participate.
Attachments:

Comment From: Ken Johnson

4/11/22 @ 9:01 AM
Should provide background to understand context for this effort. Always good to start with a problem statement. What is the issue with phthalates? For example, is there evidence of water quality standards exceedances? Contaminated sites issues? Wh...
No attachments

Comment From: Spokane Regional Health (Michael LaScuola)

4/05/22 @ 1:05 PM
In reviewing the available information on phthalates and their association with conveyor belts and belt dust, I am wondering about the inadvertent contamination this dust can cause. In my youth I worked at UPS and briefly with US Postal Service and t...
No attachments

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/24/22 @ 10:52 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/23/22 @ 10:45 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: King County Hazardous Waste Pr... (Ashley Evans)

3/21/22 @ 2:39 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/17/22 @ 8:49 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/17/22 @ 8:43 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/17/22 @ 8:40 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: BASF Corporation (PATRICK HARMON)

3/14/22 @ 6:50 AM
Some ortho-phthalates do have EPA FIFRA approval; however, those approvals are for non-food use. A typical application is as a carrier for anti-microbials that are used in plastic formulations. Based on this information, they are not used in pesticid...

https://ordspub.epa.gov/ords/pesticides/f?p=INERTFINDER:1:0::NO:1::
No attachments

Comment From: BASF Corporation (PATRICK HARMON)

3/14/22 @ 6:43 AM
Attached are our comments submitted to Canada (ECCC/HC) last year in response to their request for information on uses and alternatives to DEHP. Given that it prepared a year ago, a few revisions are needed; however, the document provides a good over...
Attachments:

Comment From: ExxonMobil (Moyinoluwa D. Adenuga)

3/03/22 @ 4:32 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

3/03/22 @ 12:01 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Spokane Regional Health Distri... (Michael LaScuola)

3/03/22 @ 11:03 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Minnesota Pollution Control Ag... (Al Innes)

3/03/22 @ 3:09 AM
Information from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's phthalates in children’s products project.
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

2/23/22 @ 5:01 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Spokane Regional Health Distri... (Mike LaScuola)

2/18/22 @ 5:15 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

2/17/22 @ 1:15 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: National Tribal Toxics Council (Larry Dunn)

2/17/22 @ 12:49 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Spokane Regional Health Distri... (Mike LaScuola)

2/17/22 @ 12:46 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: BASF (Patrick Harmon)

1/28/22 @ 12:15 PM
Attachments: